Breast Cancer, Concept Brand with Pink Ribbon Logo

Seth Godin defines a brand as “the set of expectations, memories, stories and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer’s decision to choose one product or service over another. If the consumer (whether it’s a business, a buyer, a voter or a donor) doesn’t pay a premium, make a selection or spread the word, then no brand value exists for that consumer.”

In other words, a fancy trademarked logo is not enough to make a brand. A brand must inspire people to spread the word about your “product.” One of most powerful ways to do this is through an emotional connection that encourages consumers to identify with the brand message.

Nike’s “Just Do It” slogan with accompanying “swoosh” logo dared consumers to take action and challenge themselves. Igniting a purpose beyond the mere purchase of athletic gear, the company tapped into an American belief about the importance of hard work and getting ahead. Many brands are designed to influence how people think of themselves. Am I classic, trendy, healthy, conscientious, rugged, interesting? In the context of Nike’s product line, “doing it” also meant engaging in physical activity that likely required Nike gear. But it was the message not the product that led to sales.

The pink ribbon works in a similar way. It functions as a logo for a “set of expectations, memories, stories and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer’s decision to choose” the breast cancer brand.

The breast cancer brand draws from a collection of symbols, images, and meanings within pink ribbon culture to maintain the principal message that breast cancer is a vitally important cause, and that supporting it indicates good will toward women. The brand encourages people to buy and display pink in the name of increased awareness, improvement in women’s lives, faith in medical science, and hope for a future without breast cancer. The brand capitalizes on emotional responses related to fear of the disease, hope for a cure, and the goodness of the cause.



Fear mongering, or the use of fear to influence the opinions and actions of others towards some specific end, is a key emotional dimension of the breast cancer brand. Fear mongering often involves repetition to reinforce the intended effects of this tactic, and the feared object or subject is sometimes exaggerated.

The mock advertisement for a Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) campaign found on Pinterest uses ominous coloring to bring attention to the potentially lethal danger of one’s breasts. The skeleton beneath the skin glows red against a corpse-like body. Since the image was posted on Pinterest it may not have run as an official print advertisement for BCRF. However, the message fits the general fear-mongering framework.

Women are ten times more likely to die from heart disease than from breast cancer, and they are also more likely to die from cancers of the respiratory (71,550 per year) and digestive (59,810 per year) systems than they are from breast cancer (40,170 per year). Yet widespread statistics seem to indicate that breast cancer is almost inevitable, and research studies that do not clearly explain what risk really means give the impression that almost anything and everything will contribute to the development of breast cancer.


Although it has not been shown to have survival benefits, many representations of breast cancer depict the same story of hope, courage, and joyous inspiration.

Hope for a cure party ideas

By assigning positive meaning to breast cancer and bearing witness to it through personal experience, the language and symbolism within the story and its accompanying advertisements help to produce a kind of optimistic and festive reality about breast cancer, one that may not exist in actual reality.

Clinical health psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania and Co-Leader of the Cancer Control and Outcomes Program at the Abramson Cancer Center at Penn, Dr. James Coyne points out that having a positive outlook may bring benefits to cancer patients, but there is no evidence that it prolongs life. One of the largest studies to date on attitudes and cancer showed no link between personality and cancer risk or survival. People who think optimistically get cancer and die from cancer at the same rates as people who do not. Yet hope is marketed as the cornerstone of triumphant survivorship.


Komen for the Cure’s “Imagine” campaign – launched in 2008 to mark the charity’s new trademarked “running ribbon” logo and name change from Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (held since its founding in 1982) — takes hope from the individual level to the societal, as an imagined future without breast cancer.

“Imagine” was recognized by AdAge as one of the “best ads in weekly news magazines” for 2008. “The model’s eyes appear to be fixed directly on the reader,” said Michael Galin. “Direct eye contact has been…linked with high levels of reader involvement…due to its capacity to command attention and increase the sense of intimacy and connection with the ad’s content.”

Such emotional appeals remind people of what they generally believe in and encourage them to act. Ads focus on beliefs in the inevitability of scientific progress and the goodness of the breast cancer cause. The actions are then prescribed. Have hope. Join the fight. Buy the stuff. Tell your friends. Imagine a future without breast cancer.

The dream of eradication fuels passion and participation in the cause. But without clearly defined goals, aligned actions, valid indicators of progress, systematic and continuous evaluation, and flexibility when evidence suggests needed change, how is such a dream possible?

In 2006, there were some 2.5 million women living in the United States who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. In 2013, the American Cancer Society estimated over 232,340  thousand new cases of breast cancer among women and 2,240 new cases in men, along with over 40 thousand deaths. Although 80 percent of new cases were in women over age fifty, a growing number were diagnosed at earlier ages. Nearly 33,000 newly diagnosed women in 2008 were under the age of forty-five. The National Cancer Institute reports that mortality rates for invasive breast cancer have improved from a rate of about 31 deaths per 100,000 people in 1975 to about 23 deaths per 100,000 in 2007. Over a span of 32 years, that’s eight fewer deaths per 100,000 people. These data do not support the premise that society is on a path to eradication.


The breast cancer brand encourages individuals and corporations to support the cause through consumption and social networking, with mass media offering representation for those who participate. Active members of the breast cancer audience are cast as good, great, generous, committed, and doing their part.

Avon Great People Image 16 copy

Ads for an Avon Breast Cancer Walk characterize the people and the event: “GREAT PEOPLE” and “GREAT WEEKEND.” The women’s head scarves indicate that they are survivors. They are smiling triumphantly—the message is, if these women can walk, then so can you.

Similar to other “thons,” the breast cancer walks correlate moral worth, volunteerism, and individual responsibility for one’s health (i.e., “Doing good by running well” as Samantha King argues in Pink Ribbons, Inc. Those who take part (individuals and corporations) build a civic identity based in consumption and symbolic commitment.

In addition to supporting a good cause, pink consumption is cast as an enjoyable and satisfying lifestyle choice. Another print ad in the series asks readers directly: “When was the last time you had a really GREAT WEEKEND?” The focus is on personal fulfillment. A third ad reads: “Good things come to those who WALK.” In other words, good people who do something good will receive good things in return. This sentiment once again calls upon the reader to reflect on his or her values and actions. Images of happy people engaging in fun activities suggest that good things come to those who pink.

Emotional manipulation aside, the representations that circulate in cancer culture use simple associations to depict a narrow dimension of reality that juxtaposes fear of breast cancer with hope for the future and the goodness of the cause. The breast cancer brand keeps the war going, but it does not represent the reality of the disease.

 This essay was originally published on Psychology Today, on August 31, 2013.

Be Sociable, Share!

3 comments to Breast Cancer, Concept Brand with Pink Ribbon Logo

  • Many people with metastatic breast cancer were excited when Komen featured someone with metastatic breast cancer in an ad

    But as Ginny, who has MBC, noted, “The ad, of course, is certainly not perfect, as it seems to imply that Bridget would not be surviving 7 years without her active, hopeful personality or her doctor’s ‘fighting’ for her. Does that mean that those who died sooner had the wrong medical team or the wrong personal attitude?”

    Bridget, the woman in the ad, died at age 29. Here’s Nancy Brinker’s remembrance:

    I wish they would run a tribute ad to Bridget.

  • Thank you commenting on this and highlighting the Bridget Advertisement. I certainly agree with Ginny’s thoughts about the underlying assumptions of the ad’s narrative. We need a tribute to Bridget, yes. A tribute to Rachel, yes. A tribute Marie, yes. A tribute to Susan, yes. A tribute to Jen, yes. Where do I stop? A tribute to those 40,000 women and men who died from mets last year, or the year before that, or the year before that. A tribute to those with other cancers who faced metastasis, and died. Instead, we usually just have a moment of silence for all of these people, or a nod in their general direction as we hope against hope for a different future and tell stories of transcendence while selling pink stuff. That’s been the trend. But trends can shift, especially with a little (or a lot of) insistence.

  • […] The breast cancer brand, like any other brand, is comprised of a “set of expectations, memories, stories and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer’s decision to choose” the breast cancer brand over something else. It draws from a collection of recognizable symbols, images, and meanings within, in this case, mainstream breast cancer culture (i.e. pink ribbon culture) to encourage people to buy and display “pink.” Using basic advertising principles, the brand capitalizes on emotional resonance to increase social and financial investment in the brand. […]

"women urged to get screened because it might save their lives. But that’s only 1 possible outcome, and it’s the least likely one" @cragcrest

“Pink Ribbon Blues”

Paperback includes a new Introduction on fundraising controversies and a color insert with images of, and reactions to, the pinking of breast cancer (2012).

Praise » 

Flyer »

Press Release »

Hardback Cover »

Paperback Cover »

Request Review Copies »

Order the Paperback »


"Seeing clearly through the pink haze" Toronto Sun

*Sad face*: Being happy does not help you live longer" New Scientist

How should we address breast cancer when norms continually change? The Guardian

Your Fun 'No Bra Day' Photos Are Overshadowing Terminal Breast Cancer Patients Broadly

Backlash against “pinkwashing” of breast cancer awareness campaigns BMJ

Breast Cancer to Rise 50 Percent by 2030? Hey, Not So Fast! Health News Review

Breast Cancer: The Flaws in the Cause

How to Make the Biggest Impact With Your Breast Cancer Donations Money

The Very Pink, Very Controversial Business of Breast Cancer Awareness Racked

NFL, Pink Ribbons Not Enough to Win over Women CNN

3 Questions We Need to Answer for Breast Cancer Awareness Month Chronicle of Philanthropy

The problem with National Breast Cancer Awareness Month Women's Health Magazine

Pink Ribbon Envy: Living with an Uncool Cancer The Nib

A Year After Bombings, Some Say 'Boston Strong' Has Gone Overboard NPR, All Things Considered

Canadian Mammogram Study KCRW, NPR Affiliate

Time to Debunk the Mammography Myth CNN

Breast Cancer: Awareness, Activism & Pinkwashing NPR Charlotte

Buying Pink Al Jazeera's The Stream Watch »

The Pink Backlash Orlando Sentinel

Why Jolie's Test Costs So Much CNN

Preventative Mastectomies: Disease and Deception BlogTalkRadio

Angelina Jolie and the 'Breast Cancer Gene' KCRW

Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer The New York Times Magazine.

The Story Behind the Pink Ribbon Campaign Sisters Talk Radio

WISH Interview Women's International Summit for Health

Making Cancer About The Patient, Not The Body Part CBS Pittsburgh

Sexy breast cancer campaigns anger many patients USA Today

The perils of pink The Daily

Komen pink campaign creates breast-cancer blues for some Dallas Morning News

A yellow flag for the NFL's pink New York Daily

Gayle Sulik named #7 in SharecareNow’s Top 10 Online Influencers in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer cancer causes so easily derailed Philly Inquirer

Komen Charity Under Microscope for Funding, Science Reuters

The Fight Against Cancer - And Abortion?

Susan G. Komen For the Cure defunds Planned Parenthood. In Deep with Angie Coiro

Amid Breast Cancer Month, Is there Pink Fatigue? NPR's All Things Considered

How is Breast Cancer Culture Undermining Women's Health? America’s Radio News Network

Pink Ribbon Culture and Breast Cancer The Kojo Nnamdi Show

The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Marie Claire

Does Breast Cancer Awareness Month Crowd Out Other Diseases? Slate

Pink Inc. Has Many Starting to See Red The Sacramento Bee

Get Your Pink Off Ottawa Citizen

Komen Pink Ribbons Raise Green and Questions USA Today