“Just Say No” to Pinkwashing!

Over the years “Pinkwasher” has become a common term used to describe the hypocrisy and lack of transparency that surrounds Breast Cancer Awareness Month and fundraising. Coined by the group Breast Cancer Action, it is technically defined as a company or organization that claims to care about breast cancer by promoting a pink ribbon product, but at the same time produces, manufactures, and/or sells products linked to the disease. Today, with the ubiquity of cause-marketing and breast cancer promotions, many use the term to describe anyone who supports the breast cancer cause while profiting from the disease.

Pinkwashing Collage2

Despite the broadening of the definition, Breast Cancer Action’s Think Before You Pink campaign, which started in 2002, maintains its focus on those who sell or manufacture pink-ribboned products linked to the disease. Each year Breast Cancer Action evaluates the most egregious pinkwashing examples and selects one campaign to draw public attention to the broader issue and specifically, to call out the hypocrisy of companies profiting from their affiliation with breast cancer while at the same time producing, manufacturing and selling products that are linked to the disease. “It is these entities,” says executive director Karuna Jaggar, “that fail to follow through on their self-proclaimed commitment to the cause of breast cancer, that we target for our campaigns.”

The organization has called out everything from perfumes and body care products with known carcinogens or reproductive toxins to the use and manufacture of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) found in many dairy products and linked to cancer to those now famous Pink Buckets (of chicken) for the Cure. The goals are to:

(1)  Change corporate behavior to demand accountability from specific companies that purport to care about breast cancer;

(2)  Educate consumers about pinkwashing and spread the word about Breast Cancer Action’s “Critical Questions for Conscious Consumers: Think Before you Buy Pink”;

(3)  Raise awareness so that “pinkwashing” corporations aren’t able to exploit good intentions by positioning themselves as leaders in the struggle against breast cancer while engaging in practices that may be contributing to rising rates of the disease.

Pinkwashing Collage

Toxic Time is Up

This year, Breast Cancer Action’s Think Before You Pink campaign is raising the stakes even higher. Instead of calling out specific pinkwashers, the group is going to one of the key sources of pinkwashing– the lack of regulatory control over toxic chemicals found in everyday products.

Each year corporations sell thousands of pink ribbon products with their own brand of awareness messages and fundraising promises. Yet many of these products contain chemicals linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, infertility, birth defects, and other health problems. Why are these chemicals even on the market? What’s more, how can it be that only about 200 of the over 80,000 chemicals in use in the United States have even been tested for human safety at all? Sure, the companies that sell these products, and the charities that partner with them, need to be held accountable for their part in the pinkwashing epidemic. But what about the regulatory agencies that allow these chemicals to be used in the first place?

toxic-time-is-up-logo_-cropped-300x234Breast Cancer Action’s Toxic Time Is Up campaign is calling on The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works to overhaul and update the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), which has not been updated since it was first passed in 1976. A senate hearing in 2009 acknowledged that the act is badly in need of reform, and earlier this year Sen. Frank Lautenberg [D-NJ] introduced a Chemical Safety Improvement Act (S. 1009) to reauthorize and modernize the Toxic Substances Control Act. The bill currently has a 27 percent chance of getting passed the committee and an 11 percent chance of being enacted. That is, unless people act.

UPDATE: Petition Signed

Breast Cancer Action’s Toxic Time is Up campaign urges all of us who care about breast cancer, pinkwashing, and human safety to sign this petition to press for chemical reform and take the burden off of consumers to find and purchase “safer” products.

In just one month nearly 32,000 people from across the country signed the Toxic Time is Up petition. You can also download the campaign brief by clicking here; a hard copy of the petition here; and the campaign press release here. Breast Cancer Action delivered the signatures to the office of U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, which is tasked with updating our current toxic chemical policy. Stay tuned.

Say NO to pinkwashing. Share this video.

Petition Count Updated Nov. 6, 2013

Be Sociable, Share!

2 comments to “Just Say No” to Pinkwashing!

"women urged to get screened because it might save their lives. But that’s only 1 possible outcome, and it’s the least likely one" @cragcrest cutt.ly/jei8WJr

“Pink Ribbon Blues”

Paperback includes a new Introduction on fundraising controversies and a color insert with images of, and reactions to, the pinking of breast cancer (2012).

Praise » 

Flyer »

Press Release »

Hardback Cover »

Paperback Cover »

Request Review Copies »

Order the Paperback »


"Seeing clearly through the pink haze" Toronto Sun

*Sad face*: Being happy does not help you live longer" New Scientist

How should we address breast cancer when norms continually change? The Guardian

Your Fun 'No Bra Day' Photos Are Overshadowing Terminal Breast Cancer Patients Broadly

Backlash against “pinkwashing” of breast cancer awareness campaigns BMJ

Breast Cancer to Rise 50 Percent by 2030? Hey, Not So Fast! Health News Review

Breast Cancer: The Flaws in the Cause iafrica.com

How to Make the Biggest Impact With Your Breast Cancer Donations Money

The Very Pink, Very Controversial Business of Breast Cancer Awareness Racked

NFL, Pink Ribbons Not Enough to Win over Women CNN

3 Questions We Need to Answer for Breast Cancer Awareness Month Chronicle of Philanthropy

The problem with National Breast Cancer Awareness Month Women's Health Magazine

Pink Ribbon Envy: Living with an Uncool Cancer The Nib

A Year After Bombings, Some Say 'Boston Strong' Has Gone Overboard NPR, All Things Considered

Canadian Mammogram Study KCRW, NPR Affiliate

Time to Debunk the Mammography Myth CNN

Breast Cancer: Awareness, Activism & Pinkwashing NPR Charlotte

Buying Pink Al Jazeera's The Stream Watch »

The Pink Backlash Orlando Sentinel

Why Jolie's Test Costs So Much CNN

Preventative Mastectomies: Disease and Deception BlogTalkRadio

Angelina Jolie and the 'Breast Cancer Gene' KCRW

Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer The New York Times Magazine.

The Story Behind the Pink Ribbon Campaign Sisters Talk Radio

WISH Interview Women's International Summit for Health

Making Cancer About The Patient, Not The Body Part CBS Pittsburgh

Sexy breast cancer campaigns anger many patients USA Today

The perils of pink The Daily

Komen pink campaign creates breast-cancer blues for some Dallas Morning News

A yellow flag for the NFL's pink New York Daily

Gayle Sulik named #7 in SharecareNow’s Top 10 Online Influencers in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer cancer causes so easily derailed Philly Inquirer

Komen Charity Under Microscope for Funding, Science Reuters

The Fight Against Cancer - And Abortion? Salon.com

Susan G. Komen For the Cure defunds Planned Parenthood. In Deep with Angie Coiro

Amid Breast Cancer Month, Is there Pink Fatigue? NPR's All Things Considered

How is Breast Cancer Culture Undermining Women's Health? America’s Radio News Network

Pink Ribbon Culture and Breast Cancer The Kojo Nnamdi Show

The Big Business of Breast Cancer
Marie Claire

Does Breast Cancer Awareness Month Crowd Out Other Diseases? Slate

Pink Inc. Has Many Starting to See Red The Sacramento Bee

Get Your Pink Off Ottawa Citizen

Komen Pink Ribbons Raise Green and Questions USA Today